Sudbury Vertigo Risk Score Calculator

Sudbury Vertigo Risk Score Calculator

Sudbury Vertigo Risk Score Calculator

Estimates the risk of a serious central diagnosis in patients presenting with vertigo/dizziness. Higher scores indicate greater risk.

Patient factors

Male sex = +1 point.
Age > 65 years = +1 point.
Diabetes = +1 point.
Hypertension = +3 points.

Neurologic findings

Motor or sensory deficit = +5 points.
Cerebellar signs/symptoms = +6 points. Examples: diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, dysmetria, or ataxia.
BPPV diagnosis = −5 points.
Sudbury Vertigo Risk Score
0
Low-risk band (<5)
Interpretation: Low risk of a serious central diagnosis
Published derivation risk estimate: 0% for scores below 5.
Score bands: <5 low risk, 5-8 intermediate risk, >8 high risk.
This rule supports risk stratification and does not replace clinical judgment, bedside neurologic assessment, or appropriate imaging/consultation when central vertigo is suspected.

The Sudbury Vertigo Risk Score is an emergency-department clinical risk score used to estimate whether a patient with acute vertigo/dizziness is at increased risk of a serious central diagnosis, such as stroke, TIA, vertebral artery dissection, or brain tumor. It was developed to help guide decisions about further investigation, consultation, and treatment.

It combines a small set of clinical features into a point score, including male sex, age over 65, diabetes, hypertension, motor or sensory deficit, cerebellar signs/symptoms, and whether there is a BPPV diagnosis. Higher scores mean higher risk.

The commonly used interpretation bands are:

  • <5: low risk
  • 5–8: intermediate risk
  • >8: high risk

In the derivation study, the observed risk of a serious diagnosis was 0% for scores <5, 2.1% for scores 5–8, and 41% for scores >8. In a later validation study, the observed risk was 0% for <5, 0.9% for 5–8, and 16.7% for >8.

So, in simple terms, it is a tool to help clinicians spot which vertigo patients may need more urgent workup for a dangerous central cause. It supports judgment; it does not replace the neurologic exam or imaging when those are needed.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top