Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI)

Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) Calculator

Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI)

Predicts severity and mortality risk in peritonitis using eight clinical and intra-operative factors

For use by health professionals only. The MPI provides population-level risk estimates and should support, not replace, surgical judgement, sepsis management, and ICU decision-making. Scoring assumes a diagnosis of secondary/generalised peritonitis and intra-operative confirmation.

Enter patient and intra-operative details

Age
Age in years at time of surgery. MPI adds 5 points if age > 50 years.
years
Sex
Female sex carries 5 points; male sex scores 0 points.
Organ failure present?
Kidney, lung, or shock (e.g. oliguria, severe hypoxia/hypercapnia, hypotension requiring support), according to your local MPI definitions.
Malignancy
Known intra-abdominal or systemic malignancy associated with the peritonitis.
Duration of peritonitis before surgery
Time from onset of symptoms/signs of peritonitis to laparotomy/laparoscopy (hours). MPI adds 4 points if > 24 hours.
hours
Origin of sepsis
MPI adds 4 points if origin is not colonic (e.g. gastroduodenal, small bowel, biliary, appendix).
Extent of peritonitis
Generalised/diffuse peritonitis (multiple quadrants) scores 6 points; localised peritonitis scores 0.
Character of peritoneal exudate
As seen intra-operatively. Fecal contamination carries the highest weight.
Result

Component points:
• Age: | Sex: | Organ failure: | Malignancy:
• Duration >24h: | Non-colonic origin: | Diffuse peritonitis: | Exudate:

Total MPI score (0–47):

Risk band: Not yet calculated

Enter all fields above, then click “Calculate MPI” to see the total score and an approximate mortality risk band (low / intermediate / high).

Classical MPI scoring: age >50 years (5), female (5), organ failure (7), malignancy (4), duration >24 h (4), origin not colonic (4), diffuse peritonitis (6), exudate: clear (0), cloudy/purulent (6), fecal (12). MPI ≤20 is typically associated with very low mortality (~0–5%), 21–29 with intermediate mortality, and ≥30 with high mortality (~40–60%+) in many published series. Local outcomes may differ.

The Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) is a disease-specific scoring system designed to predict the risk of death in patients with peritonitis (usually secondary/generalised peritonitis after hollow viscus perforation).

It was developed in the 1980s by Wacha and Linder from a large cohort of patients with purulent peritonitis, where 20 potential risk factors were analysed and 8 were found to be independently prognostic. These 8 factors were weighted and combined into a single score – the MPI.


Components and scoring of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index

For each risk factor present, points are assigned; their sum is the MPI score (0–47):

  • Age > 50 years – 5 points
  • Female sex – 5 points
  • Organ failure (renal, pulmonary, shock, etc., by standard definitions) – 7 points
  • Malignancy – 4 points
  • Duration of peritonitis > 24 h before surgery – 4 points
  • Origin of sepsis not colonic – 4 points
  • Diffuse / generalised peritonitis – 6 points
  • Type of exudate in peritoneal cavity
    • Clear – 0 points
    • Cloudy / purulent – 6 points
    • Fecal – 12 points

The higher the MPI, the more severe the peritonitis and the higher the mortality risk. In multiple studies and meta-analyses, MPI has shown good predictive value and is simple to apply intra-operatively.

Interpreting MPI scores (approximate)

Many studies group patients into three risk strata, for example:

  • MPI ≤ 20Low risk: mortality typically ~0–5%
  • MPI 21–29Intermediate risk: mortality often ~10–25%
  • MPI ≥ 30High risk: mortality frequently ≥40–60%

These percentages are cohort-dependent: modern peri-operative and ICU care can improve survival, but the trend (higher MPI → higher mortality) is consistent.

MPI is best used to:

  • Identify high-risk patients needing early aggressive resuscitation and ICU-level care
  • Support audit and research
  • Help in risk counselling (along with other clinical information)

It should not be used in isolation to decide whether to operate or to limit treatment.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top